TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter 1: STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Scope
1.3 Changes from 1998 SMP
1.4 Relationship to Other Documents
1.5 Relationship to Evolving Developments and Planning Initiatives
1.6 Document Flow
2.1 Supported Visions
2.2 AFSPC Vision End State
Chapter 3: CURRENT CAPABILITIES
3.1 Force Enhancement
3.2 Space Support
3.3 Space Control
3.4 Force Applications
3.5 Mission Support
3.6 Current AFSPC Baseline Summary
Chapter 4: INTEGRATED, PRIORITIZED AFSPC NEEDS
Chapter 5: AFSPC STRATEGY TO IMPLEMENT THE VISION
5.1 Near-Term (2000-2007)
5.2 Mid-Term (2008-2013)
5.3 Far-Term (2014-2025)
Chapter 6: INTEGRATED PHASED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
6.1 Fiscal Constraints
6.2 AFSPC Investment Roadmaps
6.3 Requirements and Conops Documentation Roadmap
6.4 Policy and Treaty Roadmap
6.5 Technology Linkage
7.1 Post Investment Assessment
7.2 Implementation Challenges
Chapter 8: PROGRAMMING AND BUDGETING GUIDANCE
8.1 FY02-07 POM Programming Guidance and Priorities
8.2 Prioritized FAR TERM Capabilities
Appendix A: IPP PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Appendix B: EVOLVING DEVELOPMENTS AND INITIATIVES WITH PLANNING IMPACTS
Appendix C: RATIONALE FOR PRIORITIZATION OF CONCEPTS/SOLUTIONS
Appendix E: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Figure ES-1: Future AFSPC capabilities will enable a globally
integrated Aerospace Force capable
of providing continuous deterrence and
prompt engagement
Figure ES-2: Evolving developments and initiatives will impact future AFSPC planning
Figure ES-3: Our implementation strategy provides phased emphasis for deployment
Figure ES-4: Our 25-year modernization roadmap is integrated across the mission areas
Figure ES-5: Our Mission Support Roadmap identifies upgrades and changes to basic support infrastructure
Figure ES-6: AFSPC’s plan is costly but provides capabilities essential to 21st century warfighting
Figure ES-7: Assessment against Force Enhancement Needs
Figure ES-8: Assessment against Space Support Needs
Figure ES-9: Assessment against Space Control Needs
Figure ES-10: Assessment against Force Applications Needs
Figure ES-11: Assessment against Mission Support Needs
Figure ES-12: Assessment against USSPACECOM Long Range Plan
x
Figure 1-1: SMP guides development of space capabilities for a fully integrated Aerospace Force
Figure 1-2: Mission and Mission Support areas encapsulate AFSPC capabilities
Figure 1-3: The SMP provides integrated, fiscally-constrained
planning information to the requirements,
programming and budgeting
processes
Figure 1-4: Evolving developments and initiatives will impact future AFSPC planning
Figure 1-5: Document Flow
Figure 2-1: AFSPC Vision statement focuses integration and development efforts
Figure 2-2: AFSPC’s Vision enables Air Force and Joint Visions
Figure 2-3: Force Enhancement capabilities evolve to real-time global situational awareness for warfighting
Figure 2-4: Space Support capabilities evolve to on-demand space transportation and space asset operations
Figure 2-5: Space Control capabilities evolve to full control and exploitation of space
Figure 2-6: Force Applications capabilities evolve to timely, flexible and precise Global Engagement
Figure 2-7: Mission Support capabilities form the foundation for a fully integrated Aerospace Force
Figure 2-8: Future AFSPC capabilities will enable a globally
integrated Aerospace Force capable
of providing continuous deterrence and
prompt engagement
Figure 3-1: Today’s Force Enhancement capabilities provide vital
situational awareness and C2 support
to theater CINCs
Figure 3-2: Force Enhancement Needs
Figure 3-3: Today’s Space Support systems launch and control DoD space assets
Figure 3-4: Space Support Needs
Figure 3-5: Today’s Space Control systems focus on space surveillance
Figure 3-6: Space Control Needs
Figure 3-7: Today’s Force Applications ICBMs provide strategic deterrence
Figure 3-8: Force Applications Needs
Figure 3-9: Today’s Mission Support capabilities provide the global infrastructure for space operations
Figure 3-10: Mission Support Needs
Figure 3-11: Today’s AFSPC space systems provide the starting
point for achieving a fully integrated
Aerospace Force
Figure 4-1: AFSPC near-term prioritized Needs
Figure 4-2: AFSPC mid-term prioritized Needs
Figure 4-3: AFSPC far-term prioritized Needs
Figure 5-1: Our implementation strategy provides phased emphasis for deployment
Figure 6-1: Assumed funding profile increases
Figure 6-2: Near-term (2000-2007) capabilities support initial implementation of the phased strategy
Figure 6-3: Mid-term (2008-2013) capabilities improve battlespace management and gain space superiority
Figure 6-4: Far-term (2014-2025) capabilities provide global,
real-time situational awareness; maintain
space and information superiority;
and provide prompt global conventional strike
Figure 6-5: Force Enhancement modernization roadmap represents results of the IPP
Figure 6-6: Space Support modernization roadmap represents results of the IPP
Figure 6-7: Space Control modernization roadmap represents results of the IPP
Figure 6-8: Force Applications modernization roadmap represents results of the IPP
Figure 6-9: Mission Support Roadmap represents results of the IPP
Figure 6-10: AFSPC’s plan is costly but provides capabilities essential to 21st century warfighting
Figure 6-11: Requirements and CONOPS roadmap
Figure 6-12: US policies and treaties in need of revision
Figure 7-1: Force Enhancement prioritized Needs with assessments over time
Figure 7-2: Space Support prioritized Needs with assessments over time
Figure 7-3: Space Control prioritized Needs with assessments over time
Figure 7-4: Force Applications prioritized Needs with assessments over time
Figure 7-5: Mission Support prioritized Needs with assessments over time
Figure 7-6: We are on track to support USSPACECOM LRP Operational Concepts
Figure 7-7: People, partners, funding and technology are the
pillars that provide the foundation to
implement the AFSPC Vision
Figure 8-1: Near-term (2000-2007) Integrated System Roadmap identifies new start candidates
Figure 8-2: AFSPC and Air Staff programmers and budget analysts
should consider these near-term
priorities when making funding decisions
Figure 8-3: AFRL should consider these far-term priorities for development of critical technologies